Great lecture: what was it about again?

Fluent instruction no more effective than poor delivery in teaching terms

Source: Alamy

Wake-up call: when it comes to lectures, appearances can be deceiving

Imagine you receive the same lecture twice: once from a charismatic lecturer speaking fluently without notes and maintaining eye contact; and again from a hesitant speaker, slumped over her notes and stumbling over her words. Which is better?

In terms of what you learn there is surprisingly little to choose between the two, according to a team of US psychologists.

The researchers asked two groups of students to sit through the same lecture delivered in radically different styles. When asked afterwards how much they felt they had learned, those who had experienced the more accomplished performance believed they had learned more than the second group. However, when tested, there was little difference found between them, with those attending the “better” lecture barely outperforming their poorly taught peers.

“The fluent instructor was rated significantly higher than the disfluent instructor on traditional instructor evaluation questions, such as preparedness and effectiveness,” say the researchers in the journal Psychonomic Bulletin and Review.

“However…lecture fluency did not significantly affect the amount of information learned.”

Students’ perceptions appear to be based “on lecture fluency and not on actual learning”, concludes the paper, titled “Appearances can be deceiving: instructor fluency increases perceptions of learning without increasing actual learning”. As a result, those who received the impressive lecture were disappointed with their test scores, whereas the attainment of those in the other group was more in line with their expectations.

One expert unsurprised by the result is Eric Mazur, Balkanski professor of physics and applied physics at Harvard University, who is an advocate of teaching through “peer instruction”, which involves lecturers regularly questioning students.

“With a better presenter it might seem like you are taking more in, but it doesn’t mean that anything has actually been learned - it doesn’t mean there has been an ‘Aha!’ moment,” Professor Mazur said.

“The hard work has to be done by the learner - there’s not much the instructor can do to make the neuro-connections necessary for learning.”

Professor Mazur, who is due to speak at the Turning Technologies User Conference in Karlsruhe, Germany on 3 June, said that despite modern technological advances, universities had work to do to redesign their lecture halls and rethink their teaching methods.

“What is really worrying is that people are jumping on the massive open online course bandwagon, taking a failed model and putting it online. We need to rethink how people approach teaching,” he said.

chris.parr@tsleducation.com

Already registered?

Sign in now if you are already registered or a current subscriber. Or subscribe for unrestricted access to our digital editions and iPad and iPhone app.

Featured Jobs

Head of Digital Learning UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE (MAIN CAMPUS)
Senior Lecturer in Marketing UNIVERSITY OF WESTMINSTER
Lecturer in Emissions Technology CRANFIELD UNIVERSITY
Pro Vice-Chancellor (International) NORTHUMBRIA UNIVERSITY

Register to continue  

You've enjoyed reading five THE articles this month. Register now to get five more, or subscribe for unrestricted access.

Most Commented

Black scholar at UCL claims that he lost out on a permanent job after his proposed course ‘scared’ the academy

  • David Parkins illustration (28 May 2015)

Is there a way for the two tribes to rub along? An academic and an administrator consider the rules of engagement

  • James Fryer illustration (28 May 2015)

A process at the heart of science is based on faith rather than evidence, says Richard Smith, and vested interests keep it in place

London centre that hosts Moodle environment affected

Diana Beech explains why her choice at the ballot box was an act of defiance against other academics