CVCP dismayed at rumours of spending cuts

The prospect that the government is considering cuts in university core funding drew a dismayed warning from the Committee of Vice-Chancellors and Principals on Wednesday.

Representatives told the House of Commons science and technology committee that any such move in the forthcoming comprehensive spending review would have serious repercussions. They were giving evidence to the committee's inquiry into the impact of the 1993 white paper Realising our Potential.

This is expected to feed into this summer's Science and Innovation white paper, which is expected to focus on enhancing the science base, knowledge transfer and the public understanding of science.

Alan Wilson, vice-chancellor of Leeds University, Roderick Floud, provost of London Guildhall University, and Lord Oxburgh, rector of Imperial College, London, said universities needed resources to build UK competitiveness.

"We view with dismay reports that the government may be proposing new cuts" as the UK is still investing less in basic research than in 1983, they said. There was an "urgent need to repair teaching infrastructure across the sector to avoid students being taught on out-of-date equipment in run-down laboratories".

Already registered?

Sign in now if you are already registered or a current subscriber. Or subscribe for unrestricted access to our digital editions and iPad and iPhone app.

Register to continue  

You've enjoyed reading five THE articles this month. Register now to get five more, or subscribe for unrestricted access.

Most Commented

  • Elly Walton illustration (16 July 2015)

Whether in jest or not, sexist language shows an insensitivity to gender issues at odds with academic values, argues Dorothy Bishop

  • Tony Little, Eton College headmaster, 2007

Tony Little points to ‘increasing gap’ between teaching standards at sixth form and university

  • Tourists in rubber rings and flippers ready for snorkeling class

Dress to impress if you want students in your corner, claims US study

  • gold on scales

£246 million is big money but it is probably much less than the hit the research budget would take if the REF did not exist, says Paul Jump