Big benefits 2

It is correct that covering costs of technology transfer or making a profit is extremely difficult, but it is not impossible.

A properly organised and managed unit should at least break even, but that will require many years of investment in infrastructure. At University College London we consistently generate income over and above our costs. But more relevant to the debate is whether technology-transfer offices are set up to generate cash or to act as facilitators in encouraging knowledge transfer. Many universities believe the role is the latter. Perhaps the premise that there is an expectation that TTOs should cover their costs is at fault.

Cengiz Tarhan
UCL Business Plc

Already registered?

Sign in now if you are already registered or a current subscriber. Or subscribe for unrestricted access to our digital editions and iPad and iPhone app.

Register to continue  

You've enjoyed reading five THE articles this month. Register now to get five more, or subscribe for unrestricted access.

Most Commented

  • Elly Walton illustration (16 July 2015)

Whether in jest or not, sexist language shows an insensitivity to gender issues at odds with academic values, argues Dorothy Bishop

  • Tony Little, Eton College headmaster, 2007

Tony Little points to ‘increasing gap’ between teaching standards at sixth form and university

  • Tourists in rubber rings and flippers ready for snorkeling class

Dress to impress if you want students in your corner, claims US study

  • gold on scales

£246 million is big money but it is probably much less than the hit the research budget would take if the REF did not exist, says Paul Jump