My THELoginRegister
Third Level Navigation:
09 February 2010

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

-
Main Page Content:

Selfish models lose social touch

9 July 2009

Scholar says today's universities must rediscover their responsibilities. Rebecca Attwood reports

Some universities are more focused on what they can take from society than what they can give, a leading educationist has suggested.

In a keynote speech at the Higher Education Academy's conference in Manchester last week, Ron Barnett, professor of higher education at the Institute of Education, argued that the rise of the "entrepreneurial" university had seen some institutions turn themselves "outside in".

The entrepreneurial university looked at society to see what it could extract from it "for its own ends", and was out for itself, he said.

Setting out a series of modern- university models in a lecture titled "Realising the University in the 21st Century", Professor Barnett argued that the university was a "bit of a conceptual mess".

In its original state, the university was "metaphysical", characterised by a sense that knowledge allowed humankind access to a different world and order of being, he said.

Eight hundred years later, the research university emerged. Knowledge was fragmented into different disciplines and research gained primacy over teaching, he added.

Now, besides the entrepreneurial university, the "bureaucratic university" obsessed with its own rules and the "cosmopolitan university" have arisen.

Professor Barnett said that some would argue for the concept of the "liquid university", which "moves in all directions at once, all time frames at once, all regions at once... an amoeba-type creature". But the danger of this model was that some influences were more powerful than others, he added.

"What are the ethics? Are they just muddy, or are the streams a little polluted, as the university seizes what is available to it?" he asked.

Alternative models include the "therapeutic university" centred on care and concern for its students, and the "authentic university", which takes its responsibilities for inquiry seriously.

Professor Barnett argued in favour of the "ecological university... not in itself, and not for itself, but for others, acknowledging and understanding its responsibilities to the world".

It was possible for the university to be "better than it is", he said, adding that "institutions that take the title of 'university' are not universities in the sense I'm calling them. They are not yet living up to the... practical ideals I am envisaging," he said.

He suggested that "a new kind of metaphysical university" may emerge, and argued that the university could now "determine, to some degree, what it might become".

rebecca.attwood@tsleducation.com

Readers' comments

  • phdguy 9 July, 2009

    Mr. Barnett utters nonsense. His explanations are not fully thought through and meaningless.

  • Des Hewitt 11 July, 2009

    'Being and Time': what is the University, what are the possibilties for the University in the 21st century, what could it become, and, are we in control of its construction? Professor Barnett asks some very necessary questions in rapidly changing and challenging times for our institutions. Not least, what is the culture of the 21st century University? (PhD student in sociology)

Comment on this story

Post your comment

You must fill in all fields marked *

9 July, 2009

 

Main site navigation:
Secondary site navigation:
Main site navigation end
-
 
-
Abacus E-media
Abacus e-Media
St. Andrews Court
St. Michaels Road
Portsmouth
PO1 2JH
-

Advertisement