Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Downturn sees senior management reject pay rises
16 April 2009
Vice-chancellors and other senior managers from at least eight universities have chosen to forgo their annual pay rises.
The first voluntary pay freeze was announced by Michael Arthur, vice-chancellor of the University of Leeds, who said last month that he and his senior executives had taken the decision in light of the "seriousness of the current financial situation we are facing".
Research by Times Higher Education found that seven other institutions were following suit: Manchester Metropolitan University, University College London, and the universities of Chichester, Exeter, Newcastle, Warwick and York St John.
Several other universities indicated that they would make a decision on executive salaries after national negotiations on staff pay later this spring.
The move mirrors pay freezes imposed by several US institutions and does not bode well for rank-and-file staff hoping for a sizeable pay rise in the near future.
At Manchester Met, all staff at the dean or pro-chancellor level and above have agreed not to take a pay rise; Queen Margaret University said there was a "strong likelihood" that senior management salaries would remain static; and the University of the West of England said: "It is anticipated that the cost of the senior staff salary bill will not increase."
Most of the other universities contacted by Times Higher Education said decisions on their vice-chancellors' pay had not yet been taken, although the Royal College of Art said that its senior management team did not plan to forgo rises.
Cardiff University said its board had discussed abstaining from "performance bonuses" this year and would recommend this to its remuneration committee.
The decision follows a memo to staff from David Boucher, acting head of the School of European Studies at Cardiff, which indicated that a freeze on professorial and equivalent salaries was also likely, as the university needed to cut its costs by 5 per cent.
The leaked memo of a meeting between David Grant, vice-chancellor of Cardiff, and the heads of school, adds that staff recruitment would be driven by the demands of the research excellence framework in the future, "not teaching".
"V-c left us with this message: a) we may be over-teaching in some areas; b) we may be teaching in areas that we shouldn't be," it says.
The University of Warwick is also aiming to cut its spending by 5 per cent. Nigel Thrift, its vice-chancellor, wrote to staff this month to say that cost-saving measures had made a "significant contribution" to "efforts to prevent the deficit anticipated during the current financial year rising above £3 million".
Professor Thrift also announced plans to save £12 million a year from 2009-10. "Under these circumstances, a number of senior colleagues have raised the question of whether it is appropriate for staff to receive increases in pay in the year ahead," he writes.
"It is obviously our intention to participate in the national pay negotiations for 2009, and we are committed to pay whatever salary increase is negotiated nationally for 2009-10.
"However, as part of taking action to control our costs, there will be no payments made under the senior staff salary review or staff merit pay review processes this year, saving about £750,000 in next year's budget."
At King's College London, Rick Trainor, its principal and the outgoing president of Universities UK, warned that redundancies were likely this year. "If we do not act decisively now, the result ... will be a recurrent deficit of approximately £14 million, against annual revenues of £450 million," he said this month.
King's declined to say whether Professor Trainor's pay would be frozen.
melanie.newman@tsleducation.com.






Readers' comments
This is how the VC of the University of Cumbria, Prof. Chris Carr announced staff cuts on 11 February 2009: "...The University’s Business Plan projected the University returning trading deficits in the first three years of operation before beginning to generate surpluses. The Plan made clear the need to reduce staff costs as a percentage of income from 69% (which is high compared with the rest of HE sector) to 63% by 2010/11..." Among other things, this translates to 80 staff loosing their jobs by September 2009. Recently, staff found out that the VC Prof. Chris Car, received a pay increase of 26.1% for 2007-2008, resulting in an annual salary of £181,853.
Universities that suffered from numerous scandals and sanctions from HEFCE should force their VCs to take not only a salary freeze, but a salary cut! Poor performance should be defined not just in terms of cash brought in, but in terms of prestige lost.
Think senior management of certain Universities are over paid. And salaries should be reviewed and decreased.
Perhaps there are some leadership and issues of moral principle for institutions to address? Is it good leadership to ‘take’ pay award percentages above those of your staff? In 2007/2008 there were an extraordinary number of VC pay awards well above the 6% of the national pay award received by staff in that period. Some staff not top of scale might have received a further 3%. Given that some institutions are now ‘downsizing’ perhaps either the money received by the VCs should be voluntarily paid back, or future VC pay frozen until some form of equality in pay awards has been achieved? This action may save someone’s job. There is the disproportionate effect of large percentages increasing pay differentials. Thus double gain for VCs and the very high earners.
I would be more impressed if these VCs were committing to a 2-year or 3-year pay freeze rather than 'foregoing' pay rises for what could be one year only, after which they could easily get a 'catch-up'.
Sadly the Leeds Met expenses story is not the only one within the sector. Until some external scrutiny of free loading VC's (and I don't mean the fawning governors) is in place this sort of thing is rather too common. It seems as though the VC's with the biggest salaries and expenses are often those who seem hell-bent on ruining the institutions that the are supposed to lead.
There are far too many senior administrators on high pay. They are getting even higher pay than full academic Professors...Its a joke they have no PhD, don't teach or do research and waste add very little if any value. So cut them out they spend all day writing meaningless strategy documents and doing strategy meetings and wasting academics time with their requests for info.