Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
RCA to shoulder costs as student case casts light on ELQ cuts' impact
12 March 2009
Undergraduate faced overseas fees for masters until rector's intervention. Rebecca Attwood reports
The human costs of a heavily criticised government funding decision are coming to light as university applicants are hit by the new rule.
The change means universities receive public funding towards the costs of a student place only if it leads to a higher education qualification at a more advanced level than that already held by the applicant.
One student told Times Higher Education he was "devastated" after being told that the only way he could fulfil his ambition of gaining a place on the Royal College of Art's (RCA) industrial design engineering course was by paying more than £46,000 in fees.
Jonathan Fraser, 21, who is in the final year of a four-year engineering degree at Trinity College, Cambridge, had set his sights on becoming a product designer. He won a team prize for the "most manufacturable product" and gained a first in his third year.
After paying £50 to apply to the RCA and spending a week assembling a portfolio, he was invited for an interview, which was due to take place this week. But then he received a call from the college.
It said that because he was due to graduate this summer with an MEng, and the RCA course, run jointly with Imperial College London, was also a masters-level qualification, he would be hit by the new ELQ (equivalent or lower-level qualification) rule.
He was informed that if he won a place, he would have to pay the same fees faced by international students, currently £22,850 a year, a sum he said he could not afford.
The usual fee is £4,780, which Mr Fraser hoped to cover via a studentship.
He said: "I did have a few other fallback options - a couple of job applications - but the company I had applied to has stopped recruiting because of the economic climate.
"It just seems so horribly unfair that by doing one more year, (the system) cuts me out. This will really gut the RCA course of talented young engineers."
After being contacted by Times Higher Education, Sir Christopher Frayling, rector of the RCA, made a recommendation to the college's council that an exception to the ELQ rule be made for the industrial design engineering course.
If the recommendation is approved, candidates with MEng degrees will be charged home student fees, but the institution will have to bear the extra costs.
"We believe it is imperative that we continue to attract the best students for all courses," Sir Christopher said.
The ELQ rule has been described by the University and College Union as "the most widely condemned government education policy of the past ten years".
When the rule change was announced in 2007, the Government claimed it would allow it to spend the money saved on extra places for first-time students.
However, since then it has cut the 15,000 additional student numbers it promised for 2009-10 by 5,000, and extra numbers for 2010-11 are on hold subject to a review later this year.
Some courses, including teacher training and foundation degrees, are exempt from the ELQ rule.
rebecca.attwood@tsleducation.com.






Readers' comments
I applied for this course too. Got an email literally a week before my interview advising me about the ELQ ruling. Fortunately my 'Masters' degree is from a Scottish University (Edinburgh) and is apparently not equivalent to an English Masters so I will receive the full funding. Admirable stance the RCA is taking over this ruling for the IDE course. But what about other courses?!?!?
It is now december 2009, I was in the process of applying for a MA fashion at RCA after studied a diploma at cordwainers feeling positive about specializing in accessories design ( remember fashion is a very profitable field for the country) in my case i have real talent and passion for it. a masters i studied in 2000 (CSM focused on critique and marketing in design, not practical or technical) came to haunt me as it means the elq rule applies to me. Since that masters i qualified as a teacher, work in a shop and as a single parent my only option is to specialize, How can i improve my earnings, carrers prospectus etc if i cant even contemplate to get a loan for the 48k for the two years school fees? I am writing to my local mp although i frankly don't see anyything will come out of it. found your article while researching on elq exemptions, very difficult and unfair indeed.
@Rie Bromley - your grammar needs work - as a tax payer I would be loathe to pay for your education (again) when you clearly don't (or can't) use the one you (allegedly) already have.