My THELoginRegister
Third Level Navigation:
02 September 2010

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

-
Main Page Content:

'You would barely know adult stem cells exist'

23 October 2008

Newcastle specialist quits UK for France, citing undue focus on embryo research, writes Zoe Corbyn

A renowned British stem-cell expert is to leave the UK to pursue his research in France, claiming that there is insufficient support for his work here.

Colin McGuckin, professor of regenerative medicine at Newcastle University and an expert in adult stem cells, this week hit out at both his university and UK funding agencies. He said that they were prioritising embryonic stem-cell research above work with adult stem cells, despite the more immediate clinical benefits offered by his work.

Professor McGuckin plans to leave for the University of Lyon in January, taking a research team of about ten from Newcastle, including his research partner Nico Forraz. He will open the world's biggest institute devoted to cord blood and adult stem-cell research at Lyon.

Professor McGuckin is the UK's leading scientist working on stem cells derived from babies' umbilical cord blood. This method of extraction yields cells similar to embryonic stem cells, but is far less controversial because no embryo is destroyed in the process. Professor McGuckin, a Catholic, pioneered this method with colleagues in 2005, and has used the cells to grow liver tissue.

Speaking exclusively to Times Higher Education, he said he was leaving because he had to put his patients and staff first. "The bottom line is my vocation is to work with patients and help patients and unfortunately I can't do that in the UK." He said France offered a "much better environment" both to "cure and treat more people" and to "do good work".

He said that France had kept a "much more reasoned balance" between supporting adult and embryonic stem-cell research, unlike the UK, which had focused on embryonic research to the detriment of adult stem-cell research.

"(France) is very supportive of adult stem cells because they know that these are the things that are in the clinic right now and will be more likely in the clinic," he said. "A vast amount of money in the UK from the Government has gone into embryonic stem-cell research with not one patient having being treated, to the detriment of (research into) adult stem cells, which has been severely underfunded."

He also criticised the attention embryonic stem cells received over the past year from academics, the media, Parliament and his university. "You would barely know that adult stem cells exist at Newcastle," he said.

It is not the first time Newcastle has experienced a "brain drain" of top stem-cell researchers to the Continent. Professor McGuckin joined Newcastle after his predecessor Miodrag Stojkovic took his pioneering work on stem cells to Spain in 2006.

Professor McGuckin criticised the university for not giving him the support he needed in his research. He said there was a lack of laboratory space and claimed that he had been forced to turn down a £10 million investment because the business development department "could not get it together".

Does the UK spend too much on embryonic stem-cell research?
The amount the Medical Research Council spends on stem-cell research has increased, although the proportion going to adult stem-cell research (including umbilical) has dropped.
YearTotal MRC spend% on adult stem-cell research (including umbilical)% on embryonic stem-cell research
2002-03£4.5mNo split available 
2003-04£14.5mNo split available 
2004-05£14.1m51.548.5
2005-06£17.4m43.656.4
2006-07£23.6m46.054.0
Source: MRC

Failure to reach agreement

He said he had to put more than £1.8 million of grant funding on hold because there was nowhere to do the work. "I kept getting told our situation would get better but it never did," he said.

Responding to the criticisms, Chris Day, pro vice-chancellor for the faculty of medical sciences at Newcastle, said he was disappointed and surprised that Professor McGuckin had not raised his concerns directly with the university. He said that the university took issue with each of the points the professor had raised.

A statement from the university says it has been negotiating to ensure bigger and better facilities for academics, and expansion plans are now in place. It says the business department held "extensive negotiations" with Professor McGuckin over the ownership of a company he wanted to set up, but agreement could not be reached. "We received no offer of a £10 million investment from a third party so we cannot comment further on this issue," the statement says.

The group Comment on Reproductive Ethics (Core), which opposes embryonic stem-cell research, said the loss of Professor McGuckin would create a "huge hole" in Newcastle's research portfolio.

Both the Medical Research Council and the Wellcome Trust said they funded the best proposals across all areas, whether adult, umbilical or embryonic. A spokesman for the UK National Stem Cell Network said was it was "misleading" to claim that expenditure on embryonic stem-cell research was overshadowing adult research.

But other adult stem-cell researchers agreed with Professor McGuckin that there was a need for more balanced research support.

"We desperately need more funding for adult stem-cell research because with these cells we really can make a difference to patients' lives, and we can do it now, not in ten years' time as is promised for embryonic stem cells," said Anthony Hollander, a professor of rheumatology and tissue engineering at the University of Bristol.

zoe.corbyn@tsleducation.com.

Readers' comments

  • Anthony Busk 24 October, 2008

    I suspect several in Government are anxious to underline their contempt for the unborn child by 'proving' that embryo destruction is the best way forward. it is not about science, but a clash over morality. Also a failure to have 'results' would be an embarrassment to certain ministers who have pressed for embryo stem cell research - partly because of being misinformed by their own medical advisors.

    The 'silent' voice of the profession needs to publicise its work in the media and in Parliament, so that MPs are aware of the alternative!

  • Carole O'Reilly 24 October, 2008

    I empathise with Professor McGuckin whole heartedly. Why is this government pouring our limited resources into unethical and unproven embryonic stem cell research when there is already another ethical and evidence based alternative with both adult and umbilical cord stem stells? This blind ambition to be leaders in a sensational alternative is actually doing a severe disservice to society. How can it be justified to lose a valuable scientist for therapeutic ethical stem cell research? Please wake up to the true sense of morality and science before we lose our most valued scientists and embryos to an immoral folley of our times.

  • Roger Dainty 27 October, 2008

    I totally agree with Colin McGuckins comments, as Director of a private cord blood stem cell bank we have seen much opposition in moving cord blood stem cell therapies forward in the UK. Statements from government and RCOG are not supportive for collection and storage of such an inportant resource ,which is basically a waste product after the birthing process. Colin McGuckin moving to France is their gain, and a major UK loss. The Uk is slowly being left behind by the rest of europe in relation to cord blood collection and storage, its now time for Ministers to review policies on cord blood science or we will see more movement of senior scientists moving into more supportive countries not too far away from the uk.
    <br>R J Dainty Director Future Health Cord Blood Bank

  • Renato 2 November, 2008

    From this story and others like it, it seems clearly that sometimes certain stands are more taken ideologically than in the light of what is really best for science and the good of humanity. Well I think from all this that truth must be continually serched for and persued even if others seem to ignore the question of it.

  • James Richardson 5 December, 2008

    I treat patients with skeletal tissue loss using their own stem cells and have great difficulty getting support for clinical trials. Reasons are complex and with increasing beaurocracy there is difficulty in maintaining momentum of research like this. The impressive aspect of this work is how keen patients are to develop these options. Surely ethically the patients has the most important opinion where adult or autologous stem cell treatments are being developed. Also the funds are usually of public origin. Is there a better way of facilitating these developments?

  • Alastair 29 December, 2008

    Many states fear Frankenstein and all his evil little monsters
    It's because, like the rest of us, politicians watched horror films as kids.
    Horror fiction forms part of speculative fiction.

    Get on it

  • Kenneth 2 February, 2009

    I believe the real reason for the demand for embryonic research is that there are so many embryos and pieces of embryos from abortion and fertilization clinics, that they want this free "waste" product to be at their disposal for utilization of research funds.
    Fertilization clinics will be stuck with excess growing and living embryos if not disposed of promptly, whereas abortion clinics are stuck with body parts and the disposal of formerly living human tissue.
    Life is cheap, whereas medical research and practices are not.

  • MaryKaye Hoover 14 February, 2009

    I am doing a paper on stem cell research: adult verses embryonic, and I couldn't find information on adult stem cell research until I went to the National Right to Life site thank you NRL and Times Higher Education for printing TRUTH!!

  • Fernando 5 May, 2010

    Plese i will like to have some good pectures and posts from adult sexxx to me

Disclaimer: All user contributions posted on this site are those of the user ONLY and NOT those of TSL Education Ltd or its associated trademarks, websites and services. TSL Education Ltd does not necessarily endorse, support, sanction, encourage, verify or agree with any comments, opinions or statements or other content provided by users.

Comment on this story

Post your comment

You must fill in all fields marked *

23 October, 2008

 

Please note: By adding a comment you confirm that you have read and agreed with the code of conduct under our Terms & Conditions. Comments posted on timeshighereducation.co.uk may be moderated.

Main site navigation:
Secondary site navigation:
Main site navigation end
-
 
-
Abacus E-media
Abacus e-Media
St. Andrews Court
St. Michaels Road
Portsmouth
PO1 2JH
-

Advertisement