Petition gathers momentum after academic's suspension
More than 1,700 people have signed a petition protesting against the suspension of an internationally-renowned psychology professor at Manchester Metropolitan University.
The campaign to reinstate Ian Parker, co-director of the university's Discourse Unit, which promotes "radical theory and practice" in psychology, has been launched by students and staff outraged at his removal from campus.
His supporters claim they have been given "little to no explanation" about the disciplinary charges against him.
They also say that he has been "silenced" after raising concerns about his department - a claim denied by the university.
Professor Parker is the co-founder of Psychology Politics Resistance, an international network of psychologists opposed to abusive uses of the discipline.
The online petition to reinstate Professor Parker describes him as "one of the most respected and influential scholars in the contemporary critical psychology", whose work is followed by hundreds of psychologists across the world.
China Mills, a PhD student at Manchester Met, said the "sudden" suspension had greatly affected his students.
"For his students Ian has simply 'disappeared' overnight, and while he is keen to continue supervising and teaching, he is not allowed to," she said.
A university spokesman confirmed "a professor has been suspended in accordance with the terms of its disciplinary procedure, pending an investigation into allegations of gross misconduct".
"Whilst it can obviously not comment on the exact nature or content of the allegations while they are being investigated, it can confirm that external speculation around the reasons for the suspension is wholly inaccurate," he said.
jack.grove@tsleducation.com
Readers' comments (2)
10 Oct 2012 2:52pm
We have to be critical, we have to fight! Thanks Ian Parker for the inspiration! We are with you!
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
Editor's comments
Unfortunately, we sometimes have to remove posts that could potentially be libellous and therefore contravene our terms and conditions. However, we do not want to stifle debate and encourage people to make comments on most stories we publish.
11 Oct 2012 12:06pm
It is highly irresponsible, on the part of this university's management, to leave the impression that Professor Parker has committed some heinous misdeed, but that they are not at liberty to discuss 'it'. Since when was raising, on the staff email, questions of workload and academic stress, something that could be reasonably defined as 'gross misconduct'. Since when was a professor's politely inquiring about a sudden and unexplained variation in academic appointments procedures -- something not unknown at this university, it ought to be said -- an example of reprehensible academic behaviour? No, this is smearing of an honourable and distinguished academic's reputation, and objectively intimidatory behaviour of the worst kind by a rampantly unaccountable mangerialist regime.
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment