Cookie policy: This site uses cookies to simplify and improve your usage and experience of this website. Cookies are small text files stored on the device you are using to access this website. For more information on how we use and manage cookies please take a look at our privacy and cookie policies. Your privacy is important to us and our policy is to neither share nor sell your personal information to any external organisation or party; nor to use behavioural analysis for advertising to you.

London Met v-c urged to apologise for alcohol comments

The president of London Metropolitan University students’ union has called for the vice-chancellor to apologise after he suggested the sale of alcohol should be banned from parts of the campus because some Muslim students believed drinking was “immoral”.

Claire Locke said Malcolm Gillies had "offended" Muslim students by generalising about their beliefs. There had been no calls from students to create alcohol-free areas on the London Met campus, she said.

Ms Locke argued that London Met's Muslim students were “respectful of other people’s cultures”. Muslim students’ union officers were currently fighting for a new student bar to be opened at the university’s City campus, she added.

Ms Locke said it was not true that Muslim students did not drink, and that in the previous academic year three out of the four Muslim students’ union officers had drunk alcohol. “He should retract the comments and apologise to the students he has offended,” she said.

Responding to her comments, Professor Gillies said that the Islamic prohibition against alcohol was “quite clear”, although the practice of Muslims regarding drink varied.

“It’s indisputably clear because it’s immoral [in Islam],” he said. “If you speak to virtually any Muslim student they will tell you what their teaching is.”

Professor Gillies said that some students, particularly Muslim women, would feel uncomfortable attending university events in a pub, for example, and that the concerns he raised could apply to other groups such as American Protestants or Buddhists.

“What we don’t want is the tyranny of a majority view,” he said, arguing that universities needed to have spaces where any type of student felt comfortable.

The proposals have generated a largely negative response online.

Speaking about the reaction to Professor Gillies’ comments, Ms Locke said: “I think it’s been extremely unhelpful [for London Met]. I don’t think the vice-chancellor has thought this through properly.”

She said that the university was shutting down a building called the Hub, which contains a bar, and the union was seeking a replacement. “Is he just generalising [about] the Muslim community in order to justify cuts to the student services?” she asked.

david.matthews@tsleducation.com

Readers' comments (1)

  • I am concerned. Borat may have a point. If the danger of offending Muslims means that areas should be designated as 'alcohol free' (exactly how that would change the status of any area in the university that is an unlicensed premise, I do not know) then logically there should be a limit to counselling services on such things as contraception and abortion, for fear of offending those who believe that these are immoral? As for homosexuality, well, I would have thought it highly plausible according to the logic employed by the Vice-Chancellor, that the next step would be 'gay-free zones' too? This however, is not my main cause for concern. The real issue here is one of judgment. Professor Gillies is a person who is clearly able as musician and music scholar, but does he have the right qualities to run a University? The questionable judgment he has shown here would indicate that he does not.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Print
  • Share
  • Save

Related images

  • Malcolm Gillies
  • Print
  • Share
  • Save
Jobs